Directive clinique n° 411 : Utilisation des pessaires.

OBJECTIF: Passer en revue l'utilisation, l'entretien et l'ajustement des pessaires. POPULATION CIBLE: Les femmes qui ont besoin d'utiliser un pessaire en raison d'un prolapsus génital et/ou d'une incontinence urinaire d'effort. L'utilisation peut être indiquée chez les femmes enceintes dans certains scénarios cliniques liés à la grossesse, dont l'incarcération utérine et le risque de travail préterme liée à l'incompétence du col. OPTIONS: Les pessaires constituent une option pour les femmes atteintes d'un prolapsus et/ou d'une incontinence urinaire d'effort. De plus, certains types de pessaires peuvent être utilisés chez des patientes atteintes d'incompétence du col ou d'une incarcération utérine. ISSUES: Il est possible de trouver un pessaire efficace chez la plupart des femmes atteintes d'un prolapsus génital ou d'une incontinence urinaire d'effort de façon à obtenir un excellent soulagement des symptômes, un taux de satisfaction élevé et des complications minimes. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: Les femmes atteintes d'un prolapsus génital et/ou d'une incontinence urinaire d'effort peuvent choisir d'utiliser un pessaire pour traiter leurs symptômes au lieu de subir une intervention chirurgicale ou dans l'attente d'une telle intervention. Des complications majeures ont été observées seulement en cas de soins de pessaire négligés. Les complications mineures (telles que les pertes vaginales, les odeurs et les érosions) sont généralement traitables avec succès. DONNéES PROBANTES: Des recherches ont été effectuées dans la base de données Medline afin de récupérer les articles pertinents publiés jusqu'en décembre 2018. Le présent document constitue une mise à jour de la mise à jour technique de la SOGC publiée en 2013, laquelle a été la première directive clinique publiée à l'international relativement à l'utilisation des pessaires. Une ligne directrice australienne sur l'utilisation des pessaires pour le traitement du prolapsus a été publiée plus tard en 2013. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteures ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la solidité des recommandations au moyen des critères du cadre méthodologique du Groupe d'étude canadien sur les soins de santé préventifs (annexe A). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Gynécologues, obstétriciens, médecins de famille, physiothérapeutes, résidents et moniteurs cliniques (fellows). DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATION.

Guideline No. 411: Vaginal Pessary Use.

OBJECTIVE: To review the use, care, and fitting of pessaries. TARGET POPULATION: Women requiring the use of vaginal pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse and/or stress urinary incontinence. Use may also be indicated for women with certain pregnancy-related clinical scenarios, including incarcerated uterus. OPTIONS: Pessaries are an option for women presenting with prolapse and/or stress urinary incontinence. In addition, certain types of pessaries can be considered for patients with cervical insufficiency or incarcerated uterus. OUTCOMES: Most women with prolapse or stress urinary incontinence can be successfully fitted with a pessary and experience excellent symptom relief, high satisfaction rates, and minimal complications. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Women with pelvic organ prolapse and/or stress urinary incontinence may choose to use a pessary to manage their symptoms rather than surgery or while waiting for surgery. Major complications have been seen only when pessaries are neglected. Minor complications such as vaginal discharge, odour, and erosions can usually be successfully treated. EVIDENCE: Medline was searched for relevant articles up to December 2018. This is an update of the SOGC technical update published in 2013, which was the first internationally published guidance on pessary use. Subsequently, an Australian guideline on the use of pessaries for the treatment of prolapse was published later in 2013. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the approach of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Appendix A). INTENDED AUDIENCE: Gynaecologists, obstetricians, family physicians, physiotherapists, residents, and fellows. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: RECOMMENDATION.

What Are the Clinical Factors That Are Predictive of Persistent Pessary Use at 12 Months?

OBJECTIVE: Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse are highly prevalent in women and have a significant impact on quality of life. Pessaries are devices that are used as a conservative management option. Many women use pessaries, which avoid surgical intervention with its associated morbidity and cost. However, not all women are good candidates for pessary use. The objective of this study was to determine clinical factors leading to persistent pessary use for incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse in a tertiary care centre at 12 months. Studying patient characteristics for long-term pessary use will contribute to better patient counselling, management, and health resource distribution. METHODS: This study was a retrospective outpatient chart review of new pessary fittings in patients in a tertiary care urogynaecology clinic between January and June 2014. Any woman over 18 years of age fitted with a pessary at that time was included in the study. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version. 24 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) (Canadian Task Force Classification II-3). RESULTS: A total of 152 women were fitted with pessaries. A multivariable logistic regression analysis found that a patient's diagnosis of prolapse or incontinence (P = 0.01) and a lack of complications (P < 0.0001) were statistically significant for persistent pessary use at 12 months. Patients with prolapse had 7.7 times higher odds (95% CI 1.51-39.35) of using a pessary at 12 months than did patients with incontinence. Patients without complications had 250 times higher odds (95% CI 18.52-2500) of pessary use. Patients who tried two to three pessaries had 16 times higher odds (95% CI 1.80-137.00) of persistent use than patients who trialed just one. CONCLUSION: This study has found that a lack of complications, the number of pessaries tried, and a primary diagnosis of prolapse are significant factors for continued pessary use at 12 months.

RETIRED: Technical update on pessary use.

This document has been archived because it contains outdated information. It should not be consulted for clinical use, but for historical research only. Please visit the journal website for the most recent guidelines.

Ce document a été archivé, car il contient des informations périmées. Il ne devrait pas être consulté pour un usage clinique, mais uniquement pour des recherches historiques. Veuillez consulter le site web du journal pour les directives les plus récentes.

A retrospective review of tension-free vaginal tape/transobturator tape procedures done concomitantly with prolapse repair.

OBJECTIVE: Midurethral slings have become the standard of care for women with stress urinary incontinence; prolapse repair is often also required. The primary objective of our study was to compare voiding dysfunction rates and the need for reoperation between patients having midurethral sling procedures alone versus those having midurethral sling procedures with concomitant prolapse repair. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review over a two-year period in a tertiary urogynaecology clinic. Of 108 charts, 93 had complete data for analysis. RESULTS: Patients having concomitant prolapse repair had a longer operating time, a longer hospital stay, and a longer time to resume normal voiding in the immediate postoperative period. CONCLUSION: Although tension-free vaginal tape or transobturator tape procedures with concomitant prolapse repair have a higher incidence of voiding dysfunction in the immediate postoperative period, we found that this did not persist to the six-week follow-up visit. There appeared to be no greater risk of lasting voiding dysfunction or need for reoperation after concomitant procedures.

Objectif : Les interventions de fronde mi-urétrale sont devenues la norme pour les femmes qui présentent une incontinence urinaire à l'effort; une réparation du prolapsus est également souvent nécessaire. Notre étude avait pour objectif principal de comparer, chez les patientes ne subissant qu'une intervention de fronde mi-urétrale et chez celles qui subissaient une intervention de fronde mi-urétrale et une réparation concomitante du prolapsus, les taux de dysfonction mictionnelle et la nécessité de procéder à une deuxième opération. Méthodes : Nous avons mené une analyse rétrospective des dossiers sur une période de deux ans au sein d'une clinique tertiaire d'urogynécologie. Sur 108 dossiers, 93 comptaient des données complètes aux fins de l'analyse. Résultats : Les patientes subissant une réparation concomitante du prolapsus connaissaient une durée d'opération prolongée, une hospitalisation prolongée et un délai prolongé avant le retour de la miction normale au cours de la période postopératoire immédiate. Conclusion : Bien que les interventions par bandelette vaginale sans tension ou par bandelette transobturatrice s'accompagnant d'une réparation concomitante du prolapsus comptent une incidence accrue de dysfonction mictionnelle au cours de la période postopératoire immédiate, nous avons constaté que cette situation s'était résorbée au moment de la consultation de suivi à six semaines. À la suite de la tenue d'interventions concomitantes, il ne semblait pas y avoir de hausse du risque de dysfonction mictionnelle prolongée et nous n'avons également pas constaté une nécessité accrue de procéder à une deuxième opération.

Improving resident competence and knowledge regarding tension-free vaginal tape procedure: an educational module.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a teaching module using simulation for the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure on procedural knowledge and skill. METHODS: Twenty-five gynecology residents participated in a teaching module about the TVT procedure and urinary incontinence, which included a simulated insertion on a training model. Questionnaires using 10-point scales for self-rated competence and knowledge and a written examination were administered before and after the module. A simulated TVT insertion was evaluated at an examination at 7 weeks and at 7 months. RESULTS: A significant median improvement of 44% on the written examination and at least one point on each of the self-rated competence and knowledge scales were observed after the teaching module. Residents performed the insertion well at both examinations (89% and 90%), regardless of surgical experience. More than 94% agreed the module was useful and improved their understanding of the procedure. CONCLUSION: A short teaching module and simulation session can effectively teach residents and improve their perceived competence with the TVT procedure.

Renal calyceal rupture and perirenal urinary extravasation from complete procidentia.

Genital prolapse is common among ageing women. Urinary obstruction and hydronephrosis have been reported as one of the most severe and fortunately uncommon complications. An 82-year-old multiparous woman with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse quantification stage 4 genital procidentia fails multiple trials of pessary and abandons the trials due to significant side effects. She chooses to pursue conservative management with estrogen cream and tight underwear. However, she fails to follow up as planned. Two years later, she presents with acute abdomen and renal failure due to renal calyceal rupture and perirenal urinary extravasation from complete procidentia. She is treated promptly with urinary catheter, manual prolapse reduction, and Gellhorn pessary which relieves anuria and stabilizes her condition. She then receives definitive surgical treatment 2 weeks later. Her renal failure and abdominal pain resolve post-operatively.

A retrospective review of patients seen in a multidisciplinary pelvic floor clinic.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary team care is becoming more popular for complex health issues, including pelvic floor dysfunction. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the records of 207 patients attending a multidisciplinary pelvic floor dysfunction clinic. A telephone survey was also conducted. The outcomes investigated included conservative versus surgical management, comorbidities, number of specialists seen, and subjective patient feedback. RESULTS: The average patient was 59.9 years old and travelled an average distance of 128.6 km to attend the clinic. Common clinical presentations were urge urinary incontinence (58.9%) and stress urinary incontinence (54.6%). Ninety-three of 178 patients (52.2%) presented with at least two comorbidities. At the time of data collection, 52.2% of patients had opted for surgical management, 27.5% had chosen conservative management, and the remainder remained undecided. One hundred sixty-five women participated in the telephone survey and their responses were grouped into major themes: (1) wait times, (2) multidisciplinary clinic feedback, and (3) parking, patient education, and information distribution. CONCLUSION: Based on feedback, the majority of patients were accepting of a multidisciplinary approach to pelvic floor dysfunction and were satisfied with that approach.

A review of the concordance of diagnoses made after multi-channel urodynamics and video urodynamics in women with urinary incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: Symptoms of urinary incontinence often do not correlate well with the diagnosis provided by urodynamic investigations. Video urodynamics has been described as the "gold standard" investigation for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. The aim of our study was to determine the concordance of diagnoses made on multi-channel and video urodynamics in women presenting with urinary incontinence to a tertiary care urogynaecology unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 38 women who had video urodynamics and a multi-channel study completed within a one-year period. All patients had a complete history and pelvic floor assessment. The investigators completing each study were blinded to the clinical diagnoses, the physical findings, and the other urodynamics diagnoses. International Continence Society standards were followed for completion of all urodynamics investigations. Multi-channel studies were completed with the patient lying supine and video studies were performed with the patient sitting on a commode. The level of agreement of the diagnoses was calculated using a kappa (kappa) statistic with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The median age of subjects was 61 years (range 14-79), with a median duration of lower urinary tract symptoms of 6.0 years (range 0.5-41). Patients had had a median of two previous bladder surgeries (range 0-5). The level of concordance of the two diagnoses gave a kappa of 0.16 (95% CI 0.06-0.26). CONCLUSIONS: There was poor concordance between the diagnoses made on multi-channel and video urodynamics when the two tests were performed on the same patient. Prospective studies are required to evaluate the reproducibility of diagnoses made on cystometry.

Prevalence and risk factors for urinary and fecal incontinence four months after vaginal delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of and risk factors for urinary and fecal incontinence four months after vaginal delivery. METHODS: All patients who had vaginal deliveries at a tertiary care hospital over a three-month period were approached during their postpartum hospital stay regarding participation in the study. Participants underwent a telephone interview at four months after their delivery to determine the presence and type of any incontinence. RESULTS: Of 632 patients, 145 (23%) had stress incontinence, 77 (12%) had urge incontinence, 181 (29%) had any urinary incontinence and 23 (4%) had fecal incontinence. In univariate analysis, stress incontinence was found to be increased in patients>or=30 years of age (26.2%) compared with patients<30 years of age (19.3%) (RR 1.4; 95% CI 1.0-1.8, P=0.05). Urge incontinence was increased in patients who had a forceps delivery (21%) compared with no forceps delivery (9%) (RR 2.2; 95% CI 1.4-3.6, P=0.005), an episiotomy (32.4%) compared with no episiotomy (18.7%) (RR 1.9; 95% CI 1.2-2.9, P<0.01) and a longer second stage of labour (108 min vs. 77 min, P=0.01). The prevalence of any urinary incontinence was increased with forceps delivery (15.5%) compared with no forceps delivery (8.7%) (RR 1.5; 95% CI 1.1-2.1, P=0.01) and maternal age of >or=30 years (34.1%) compared to <30 years (23.5%) (RR 1.5; 95% CI 1.1-1.9, P=0.003). In multivariate analysis, the two variables that remained significant for any urinary incontinence were maternal age>or=30 years (P<0.01) and forceps delivery (P<0.01). There were no identified risk factors for fecal incontinence. CONCLUSION: Urinary incontinence is common in women at four months post partum. Fecal incontinence is less common. Maternal age and forceps assisted delivery were risk factors for urinary incontinence.

Case report of tension-free vaginal tape-associated bowel obstruction and relationship to body habitus.

Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) is increasingly being used as the gold standard to treat stress urinary incontinence. Previously reported complications include peritoneal perforation with acute bowel injury. A thin, petite 51-year-old woman with stress urinary incontinence underwent uneventful TVT placement. Three years later, she presented to hospital with de novo small-bowel obstruction. Laparotomy revealed TVT tape violating the peritoneum and causing the distal ileum to adhere to the pelvic sidewall. The compromised bowel was resected and primary anastomosis performed. Delayed, adhesion-related small-bowel obstruction can be a complication of TVT.

RETIRED: Midurethral minimally invasive sling procedures for stress urinary incontinence.

This document has been archived because it contains outdated information. It should not be consulted for clinical use, but for historical research only. Please visit the journal website for the most recent guidelines.

Success of pubovaginal sling in patients with stress urinary incontinence and efficacy of vaginal sling release in patients with post-sling voiding dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the overall success of sling procedures and surgical sling release in achieving urinary continence and voiding function in women with stress urinary incontinence. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 107 patients with stress urinary incontinence who had a two-team abdominal-vaginal fascial sling procedure performed between January 2000 and December 2003. Data reviewed included the patients' medical history, demographic data, findings on physical examination, urodynamic studies, operative report, and findings at visits 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. Patients with sling releases were followed up to assess pelvic organ prolapse, uroflowmetry, and post-void residual urine volume, and to complete the quality of life questionnaire IIQ-7. RESULTS: At one year after pubovaginal sling surgery, 82.1% of patients were cured of stress urinary incontinence. The majority (85.1%) of patients did not develop postoperative voiding dysfunction. Only 5.6% of those who did develop postoperative voiding dysfunction required surgical sling release. Sling release resolved the post-sling voiding dysfunction in three out of five patients. CONCLUSION: Pubovaginal sling surgery is a highly successful strategy for the management of stress urinary incontinence and has a low rate of postoperative voiding dysfunction. Surgical sling release may resolve post-sling voiding dysfunction.

Reflection on academic protected time: an opportunity to integrate educational programs.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify the structure of academic protected time curriculum and to determine interest in a knowledge-sharing, web-based initiative. METHODS: We undertook a survey of the 16 obstetrics and gynaecology program directors in Canada. RESULTS: The response rate was 88%. Seventy-one percent of the responding program directors are responsible for developing protected time curriculum. Seventy-eight percent use a template based on a two-year rotation of topics, 64% use lectures as the main educational format, and 50% have incorporated professional competencies into academic time. The largest barrier to curriculum development is time constraints. Seventy-eight percent of program directors are interested in a network for sharing ideas. CONCLUSIONS: In most programs, the curriculum for academic protected time is developed by program directors, who are dependent upon lectures and limited by time constraints. Programs therefore have difficulty integrating professional competencies into the academic curriculum. This educational environment could prove fertile ground for establishing a collaborative curriculum initiative.

Vaginal pessaries in managing women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: patient characteristics and factors contributing to success.

OBJECTIVE: An aging population has resulted in higher prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This study examines a nurse-run clinic and analyzes the factors contributing to successful pessary use. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of 1,216 patients was completed. History, pelvic examination and pessary fitting was done. Data was analyzed utilizing a categorical model of maximum-likelihood estimation to investigate relationships. RESULTS: Median patient age was 63 years. Median number of pessaries tried was two. Eighty-five percent of post-menopausal women were on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) prior to fitting. Highest success rate of 78% was in the group on both systemic and local HRT. Success rates ranged from 58% for urge incontinence to 83% for uterine prolapse. Prior vaginal surgery was a factor impacting success. In our series highest success rates for fitting were obtained with ring pessaries, ring with support, and gellhorns. CONCLUSIONS: This model is a viable, option for the conservative management of UI and POP. Local HRT plays an important role in successful pessary fitting. Complications are rare.

Bulking agents for stress urinary incontinence: short-term results and complications in a randomized comparison of periurethral and transurethral injections.

The purpose of our study was to compare the two standard routes of urethral bulking injection in a prospective randomized trial. Forty women with genuine stress incontinence (n = 36), or mixed incontinence with a minor and controlled urge component (n = 4), participated in a urethral bulking agent trial. All patients had a standardized preoperative evaluation which included history, physical examination, assignment of incontinence status on a Stamey grading scale, postvoid residual (PVR) determination, Valsalva leak-point pressure, maximal urethral closure pressure, functional urethral length, Q-tip excursion angle, quantitative pad test, and completion of a quality of life questionnaire. On the day of injection they were randomly assigned to a periurethral or transurethral route of injection based on a computer-generated block randomization scheme. An ultrasound-determined PVR was obtained on all patients after injection. If self-catheterization was necessary, and the PVR was > 200 ml, urinary retention was diagnosed. Postoperative assessment included a patient interview, subjective assessment of improvement, PVR, voiding diary, and assignment of incontinence grade. At the screening visit there were no significant differences between the groups for any variables except type of stress incontinence. With short-term follow-up both transurethral and periurethral routes of injection seem to be equally efficacious. In the periurethral injection group there was a higher rate of postoperative retention; this group had a significantly higher volume of injectable agent used. There was no significant difference in risk of urinary tract infections between the two groups. We conclude that both periurethral and transurethral methods of bulking agent injection for stress urinary incontinence are equally efficacious, with minimal morbidity.